The increasing complexity of research environments in higher education has prompted a shift toward digital tools that support data stewardship, reproducibility, and collaborative inquiry. Among these, Electronic Lab Notebooks (ELNs) have become central. Open source ELNs, in particular, offer alignment with the academic world's values of code transparency, FAIR data principals, low entry cost, and the possibility of customized connections to other data tools. On the other hand use of open source ELNs also raises important questions related to deployment, hosting, integration with infrastructure, sustainability, security, compliance and institutional capacity.
Recent developments in the open source ecosystem—include the appearance of enterprise grade open systems with available paid support packages and managed deployment options. These types of systems address earlier limitations of "home brew" open source ELNs, positioning the former as more viable options for institutions seeking scalable research data solutions. This article critically examines the advantages and challenges of open source ELNs within the academic development landscape, with attention to early career researchers, student learning, data integrity, legal compliance, cost, and reproducibility.
Affordability and Strategic Cost Management
Open source ELNs can be free to download and use, assuming that the user has the technical aptitude to configure a complex client-server system themselves, and that they have access to a suitable environment for hosting the server and all of its data. If that is not the case, then the good news is that some modern open source ELN systems offer paid support tiers that include cloud hosting, deployment assistance, integration services, and technical assistance. This hybrid model allows small labs or even entire institutions to enjoy the benefits of a professionally managed system, but reduce dependency on high-cost proprietary software while retaining full environment and data control (Kanza et al., 2017). Some examples of systems that use this hybrid open source with paid support model are RSpace, SciNote and ElabFTW. The price paid by institutions for managed deployments of these systems varies between 50 and 500 USD per user per year depending on the system, the number of users, and many other factors, but this price range is pretty reasonable when compared to equivalent commercial products used by large pharmaceutical companies. It’s also very reasonable considering that the acquisition, integrity, reproducibility and long-term safety of data is arguably the primary raison d'être of university research labs, and therefore something that certainly should be made a top priority.
Theoretically, the flexibility of hybrid open source systems also enables cost-effective pilot systems, and fast, cost effective deployment of a reliable production system at scale, aligning with institutional priorities for both fiscal responsibility and digital transformation and better awareness of research activities and data collection institution-wide (European Commission, 2016). It also allows smaller or less-resourced institutions to participate in the digital research ecosystem without compromising access or functionality.
Capacity Building for Early Career Researchers
For early career researchers, open source ELNs foster habits of transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration. These tools promote structured, searchable, and shareable record keeping, supporting the development of data literacy and research integrity (Freedman et al., 2015).
When paired with centrally managed support systems, ELNs can be integrated into research training and mentoring programs, encouraging best practices in data stewardship from the outset of researchers’ careers (Lowndes et al., 2017). Use of Open Source ELNs is especially desirable because of the greater range of cost strategies, deployment options and data mobility, making it easier for data or copies of data to travel with the scientist as they move between institutions, and as their rank, funding and oversight and data publication needs change over the course of their career.
Expanding Visibility and Continuity of Student Research
A growing use case for ELNs lies in undergraduate and postgraduate education. Research projects conducted as part of coursework or dissertations often generate valuable data or insights that are not destined for journal publication. ELNs provide a platform for preserving, showcasing, and potentially publishing this work in a semi-formal context.
Making student research visible in this way enhances its discoverability, value, and impact (Borghi et al., 2018). ELNs also offers professional development benefits—students can share their research data with potential employers or collaborators and revisit their work in future research contexts, enhancing research continuity and identity formation as emerging scholars (Brew, 2023). Some systems even have the ability make selected work fully available for indexing by google and other search engines such that web searches by researchers working in specialized fields will find relevant studies performed by students, possibly introducing those students to new professional connections and future job opportunities. Again, the flexibility of open source systems can offer an enhanced range of strategies for students at any point in their training and early career paths.
Reproducibility and Research Integrity
Open source ELNs support reproducibility through features such as time-stamped entries, version control, well defined, distributable protocol templates and integration with computational workflows (Karkkainen et al., 2022). These features help ensure research can be verified, reused, or built upon, aligning with funder mandates and journal expectations around open and transparent research.
Universities that adopt ELNs institution-wide can foster consistent standards in research documentation, ensuring robust audit trails and institutional readiness for external evaluation or legal challenges. The lower cost of open source systems helps them compete with other cheap, but less that idea alternatives such as MS SharePoint or google docs, which although attractive and familiar, absolutely do NOT offer the same advantages for research integrity. Only a fully 21CFR11 compliant ELN system guarantees the accuracy and integrity of electronically collected digital records.
Legal Compliance and Ethical Considerations
Historically, open source tools have struggled with full regulatory compliance, in part because to be fully compliant they often need to be hosted on a robust, validated environment and not on a graduate student’s home server, and they may need to integrate with university SSO systems in order to be sure of user identity and affiliation. However, modern hybrid systems like RSpace offer optional support packages essentially as “add on” services to help with issues like GDPR compliance, encrypted storage, backup, and university-managed access control and formal training, making them fully 21CFR11 compliant and suitable for GMP research or research involving sensitive or regulated data. Some also offer delegated, hierarchical data oversight and system administration. Ensuring institutional oversight and guidance in these areas is critical. Without proper governance, individual researchers may lack the knowledge required to manage legal and ethical risks, particularly when dealing with human subjects or biomedical data.
Sustainability and Institutional Integration
Concerns around sustainability have long hindered the broader adoption of open source software in academic environments. Community-driven development, while dynamic, can lead to uncertainty around long-term viability. The introduction of support contracts and hosted enterprise deployments mitigates these concerns by ensuring continuity, updates, and compliance that is also managed by a professional team with a long-term financial stake in the system’s continued existence (Petrisor et al., 2021).
Institutional IT teams can now treat open source ELNs as enterprise-grade services, integrating them with identity management systems and aligning them with cybersecurity policies and Research Data Management (RDM) pipelines. This opens new possibilities for institution-wide adoption, from small labs to large collaborative networks. Best of all, the engineering collaborations between the vendor and user base can greatly enhance each institution's own vertical integration objectives (Plankytė et al 2025). It's true that this may involve recruiting university software engineers to work on complex problems and spend university time contributing to the system, but this is hardly "lost time" since presumably the only alternative is creation of the features the university wants outside of the ELN, and most likely this would take at least as long. By building on top of a managed system, the university gains access to the vendor as a full partner who can assist with testing, quality control, technical advice and distribution of the new features to other universities for the benefit of all. Involvement of university developers also helps alleviate sustainability fears because developers who already know the product and are familiar with its code would be in a better position to take over development and upkeep if the vendor were to end its formal support for the system.
Conclusion
Open Source, Professionally Supported, and Pedagogically Valuable
Open source Electronic Lab Notebooks now offer a pragmatic, sustainable, and pedagogically rich alternative to proprietary systems. Their alignment with open science values, coupled with new support models, makes them a compelling option for institutions seeking to enhance research integrity, student engagement, and cost-effectiveness.
For early career researchers and students alike, ELNs provide not only a tool for rigorous documentation but also a platform for scholarly visibility and future research continuity. Academic developers and institutional leaders who invest in these systems—not only as technologies but as pedagogical and professional development tools—stand to cultivate a more open, inclusive, and future-oriented research culture. Of the three best known ELN systems of this type (RSpace, Scinote and ElabFTW) Scinote is focussed primarily on commercial customers, and ElabFTW is focussed mainly on smaller lab deployments, with only RSpace designed specifically for large-scale, long-term deployment to entire universities, and this is reflected in the specialized SSO, filestore and RDM integration, integration with a plethora of well-known third-party research tools, hierarchic administration and free large-scale hosting services offered as part of the standard RSpace deployment package, as well as exhaustive documentation and a thriving github community.
Join the RSpace subreddit here: https://www.reddit.com/r/RSpaceELN
References
Borghi, J., Van Gulick, A. E., & Hodges, T. L. (2018). Support for student data management at U.S. academic institutions. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 7(1), e1124. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2018.1124
Brew, A. (2023). Researcher development and student identity: Changing understandings of academic practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2132134
European Commission. (2016). Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: A Vision for Europe. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3213b335-1cbc-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1
Freedman, L. P., Venugopalan, G., & Wisman, R. (2015). Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities. FASEB Journal, 29(9), 3729–3735. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.15-100100
Kanza, S., Sword, S., Gibbins, N., et al. (2017). Electronic Lab Notebooks: Can they replace paper?. Journal of Cheminformatics, 9(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-017-0221-3
Karkkainen, T., Aavik, G., Vahdat, M., et al. (2022). Electronic lab notebooks improve transparency and reproducibility in research. Nature Communications, 13, 5175. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32885-2
Lowndes, J. S. S., Best, B. D., Scarborough, C., et al. (2017). Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1, 160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0160
Petrisor, A., Gavrilescu, A., & Vlad, C. (2021). Evaluating the sustainability of digital infrastructure for scientific research: The case of open source lab notebooks. Journal of Open Research Software, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.315
Plankytė, V., Edmunds, R., and Macneil, R.: Case Study of Vertical Interoperability Between Research Tools Enabling an End-to-End Sample Workflow from Collection, to Management, to Archiving, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9046, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9046, 2025.
